Shareholder Class Action

Recent Cases

Shareholders sued Calpine Corp. and its directors, claiming they are selling Calpine too cheaply to NRG Energy, for $23 a share, or $9.6 billion, a 6.7% premium over market price, in Harris County Court, Houston.
    
Shareholders claim directors of Wendy's International withheld information and engaged in self-dealing, in a class action in Franklin County Court, Columbus, Ohio.
    
TRM Corp. and its directors inflated share price through false and misleading statements, shareholders claim in Portland, Ore., Federal Court.
    
Shareholders claim American International Group inflated the value of its securities through false and misleading statements from May 11, 2007 through May 9, 2008, in Manhattan Federal Court.

Related listings

  • Court Says Cop's Criticism Isn't Protected Speech

    Court Says Cop's Criticism Isn't Protected Speech

    Recent Cases 05/22/2008

    An Illinois State Police officer was not wrongfully transferred for accusing his superiors of sabotaging his investigation of a cold-case murder, the 7th Circuit ruled. Plaintiff Michale Callahan filed a First Amendment retaliation claim against his ...

  • Ex-Lottery Commissioner Loses Conviction Appeal

    Ex-Lottery Commissioner Loses Conviction Appeal

    Recent Cases 05/20/2008

    The 4th Circuit upheld the conviction and sentencing of ex-North Carolina lottery commissioner Kevin Geddings, who concealed the fact that he had a conflict of interest with a lottery vendor. A federal jury convicted Geddings of five counts of mail f...

  • Skycaps File National Class Action

    Skycaps File National Class Action

    Recent Cases 05/16/2008

    Employers are cheating airport skycaps nationwide by paying them less than minimum wage and discouraging tipping by charging a $2 per bag "baggage fee," which customers falsely believe will be given to the skycaps, the skycaps say in a federal class ...

Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC

A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party

Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party

However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.

Business News

West Hartford, Connecticut Special Education Lawyer Forte Law Group focuses on special education law and empowering parents to advocate for their child’s rights. >> read