Bear Stearns Will Pay $28 Million
Litigation Reports
Bear Stearns and subsidiary EMC Mortgage on Tuesday agreed to pay $28 million in settlement with the Federal Trade Commission, on charges of defrauding tens of thousands of home loan customers and violating four sets of federal laws.
"The companies violated four different federal laws, "said Frank Dorman, the spokesperson for the FTC. "We hope people in mortgage servicing companies will read this judgment and adhere to the law."
Bear Sterns through its mortgage subsidiary, EMC, has handled 475,000 mortgage loans in the last year.
Apart from misrepresenting the amounts borrowers owed, said the FTC's complaint, the company charged unauthorized fees to clients. One such fee was the $500 loan-modification fee, which was automatically added to the loan's principle balance, without notice to the client.
The company also made harassing collection calls, where agents would wrongly state the legal status or amount of the customers' debts.
The defendants also failed to notify customers of their right to obtain verification of the debt, or of their right to dispute the debt. When the loans were contested, the defendants failed to report the dispute to credit reporting agencies, as required by law.
Bear Sterns and EMC did, however, illegally share information about the customers' payment status with credit reporting agencies.
In total, the FTC Act, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, and regulation Z of the Truth in Lending Act were all violated.
Apart from the $28 million in redress to affected customers, the settlement prohibits the companies from violating these laws in the future, and requires that they establish and maintain a comprehensive data integrity program to ensure accuracy of their data regarding consumers' loans.
The companies must also hire a qualified and independent group to ensure compliance with the settlement.
Apart for redress to consumers, no fines were imposed.
Bear Steams and EMC Mortgage are represented by Kevin Arquit, from Simpson Thacher & Bartlett.
Related listings
-
Court strikes down Hawaii law requiring permission to carry guns
Litigation Reports 06/25/2026The Supreme Court struck down a Hawaii law requiring people to get permission to carry guns into stores and hotels on Thursday, in its latest opinion backing Second Amendment rights.The high court's 6-3 decision means people can carry guns onto priva...
-
Supreme Court will decide whether criminal cases must have 12 jurors, in Florida case
Litigation Reports 06/18/2026The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to decide whether states can use juries made up of only six people in criminal cases, instead of the usual 12. The case puts a Florida chiropractor convicted of practicing with a suspended license in an unlikely lea...
-
Appeals court rules that Trump's asylum ban at the border is illegal
Litigation Reports 04/28/2026An appeals court on Friday blocked President Donald Trump's executive order suspending asylum access at the southern border of the U.S., a key pillar of the Republican president's plan to crack down on migration.A three-judge panel from the U.S. Cour...
Is Now the Time to Really Call a Special Education Lawyer?
IDEA, FAPE, CHILD FIND and IEPs: The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) guarantees all children with disabilities to a free appropriate public education (FAPE). FAPE starts with a school’s responsibility to identify that a child has a disability (Child Find) and create an Individualized Education Program (IEP) to suit the needs of the child. Parents need to be persistent, dedicated and above all else aware of the many services and accommodations that their child is entitled to under the law. As early as this point within your child’s special education, many parents will often find themselves in the situation asking, “is now the time to really call a special education lawyer?” Here are a few things to consider when asking yourself that question.
